Here's the bike rally route, 11am-1pm, Thurs 7 July 2011
View Bike Rally! 11am - 12pm Thurs. July 7 in a larger map
Lana Popham's Twitter Feed
Why Bikes are Best!
- The bicycle is the most efficient vehicle ever devised; a human on a bicycle is more efficient (in calories expended per pound and per mile) than a train, truck, airplane, boat, car, motorcycle or jet pack.
- Nearly half of all trips in the North America are three miles or less; more than a quarter are less than a mile, distances easily covered by bike while saving you money and getting you fit.
- Every mile traveled by bike rather than by car keeps one pound of climate-damaging carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, while reducing cash draining stops at the pump.
- Bicycles outnumber automobiles almost two to one worldwide, and their production outpaces cars by three to one.
- Of all the trips in the North America, just two-thirds of a percent are made by bicycle.
- Only 1 percent of Canadian commuters report bicycling as their usual mode of transportation.
- The average car produces about five tons of carbon dioxide per year. In the US, cars were the source of about one-third of global warming pollution in 2005.
- If Americans replaced just one in five of their average length car trips by bicycling, each driver would spare the atmosphere more than one ton of carbon dioxide emissions. Collectively, the effect would be comparable to taking 48 million vehicles off the road.
- Short car trips are the easiest to replace with a bike trip. Mile for mile, they are also the most polluting.
- For each mile of new lane, the materials and machinery used to build a highway release between 1,400 and 2,300 tons of greenhouse gases.
- Among major U.S. cities, those with extensive bicycle lanes have three times the rate of bike commuting compared to other cities.
- Bike-friendly policies, from traffic calming to car free downtown zones, have boosted cycling rates in five European nations to 10 percent or more of urban trips; one-fifth of all trips in Danish cities are made by bike, and one-third in Dutch cities.
- It costs as much as twenty times more to support a passenger mile of automobile traffic compared to one of bicycle traffic.
- In the long run, the measures most crucial to getting more people on their feet and on their bikes are those that fight sprawl and encourage dense, livable cities. On average, city dwellers drive a third as much and half as fast as suburbanites.
7% decrease in cost of bikes, bike repairs and bike equipment
Thank-you to all those who took part in our bike rally last Thursday!!
Rally this Thursday and Vote Yes to extinguish the HST on bikes in BC
Join me this Thursday July 7 for a bike rally!
Our message is clear: Vote Yes to extinguish the HST on bikes in BC!
The rally starts at 11am sharp at Performance Cycles, 3949 Quadra St.
We’ll pick up riders along the way. Our tentative schedule includes stops at Ryder's Cycles, and Straight-Up Cycles.
The rally finishes at Capital City Cycles, 1419 Broad St, at 12pm with a few short speeches by leaders in the cycling and anti-HST community.
Click here for the route.
For thirty years, bikes (and bike expenses like repairs, helmets and locks) were PST exempt. Why? Because it makes no sense to tax such a healthy and environmentally-friendly form of transportation. The HST ended the exemption and in effect created a new 7% tax cycling.
Just over a year ago squeakywheels.ca brought together thousands of cyclists from across BC who opposed the HST and the new tax it put on cycling.
Over 500 hundred of us rallied on the front steps of the Legislature and I submitted a petition to the Speaker of the House with over 5000 signatories.
With the HST referendum ongoing, now is the time for cyclists to again come together and send a strong message: Vote Yes to extinguish the HST on bikes in BC!
Can the B.C. Liberal government explain how jacking up the price of a bike is going to help make B.C. more sustainable or encourage people to make healthy lifestyle choices?
And how does a new tax on cycling possibly advance B.C.’s Climate Action Plan? Getting people out of their cars and onto their bikes will reduce carbon emissions. It also means less traffic congestion, less wear and tear on our roads and lower health-care costs.
A government that increases taxes on green transportation is traveling in the wrong direction.
Join me for a ride on Thursday and let's help turn this thing around!
Lana
Lana Popham
MLA, Saanich South
Seeking critical mass for safer cycling
Vancouver— From Monday's Globe and Mail
Published Sunday, Sep. 05, 2010 8:00PM EDT
It’s a sunny summer morning and the Burrard Street Bridge is buzzing with rush-hour traffic. By day’s end, about 6,000 bicycle trips will have been made over the bridge, an increase of 24 per cent since the separated-bike-lane trial started on July 13, 2009.
Vancouver Mayor Gregor Roberston is hailing it as a success and last month city staff gave away T-shirts to celebrate one million riders crossing the bridge in less than one year.
For Gordon Lovegrove, a civil engineering professor at the University of British Columbia, a million is not enough.
He researches sustainable road safety, which combines safer road-network design and green transportation to reduce collisions. He says that while safe cycling infrastructure, like separated bike lanes on the Burrard Bridge and Dunsmuir Viaduct, is important, a critical mass of cyclists is key to seeing a significant and sustainable change in road safety for both motorists and cyclists.
Once there is a critical mass of bicycles, drivers become more aware of cyclists as road users and change their driving habits accordingly, explains Prof. Lovegrove.
Although almost 50 per cent of Vancouverites live within five kilometres of their work, only 4 per cent of commuting trips in Vancouver are made by bicycle. Prof. Lovegrove estimates that for critical mass, 25 per cent should be riding their bikes to work.
Jerry Dobrovolny, director of transportation for the City of Vancouver, agrees that an increase in the number of cyclists would affect driver behaviour, and adds that the demographic that has the most potential for growing the cycling population is women between the ages of 25 and 35. Historically, young men who are comfortable weaving in traffic have predominated among the city’s cyclists. Research shows that one of the barriers to increasing cycling as a mode of transportation is proximity to traffic, and with more dedicated bike lanes there has been a definite increase in cyclists – especially young women.
To further study how cycling affects road safety, Prof. Lovegrove and his team will use his expertise in collision prediction modelling, but the team will have to go overseas to find data since the cycling population in B.C. is too small. They’re looking to partner with institutions in the Netherlands and China, where cyclists make up 40 per cent of the traffic in some areas.
Cycling road safety is just one area of interest for Prof. Lovegrove, who recently completed a joint study with the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. John Pump, ICBC’s road improvement strategy manager, observed on his commutes to the airport that left turns and parked cars at intersections on Granville Street without traffic lights were notable hazards. He asked Prof. Lovegrove to quantify that hunch.
The professor and his team confirmed that parking and left turns are related to as much as 30 per cent of intersection collisions, and they developed a suite of models to predict the rate of collision reduction on major arterials like Broadway and Granville Street if parking and turning restrictions were implemented.
Mr. Dobrovolny says this is valuable research and it’s one aspect the city considers when planning transportation projects. “The challenge of managing the road system is finding a balance between needs,” he explains. Congestion and budget are other considerations, with resources being dedicated to the highest collision areas.
Prof. Lovegrove has also created a blueprint for a new community design for roads that his models predict will have 60 per cent fewer collisions than conventional road patterns.
“Good community planning allows for access by people in and out of the community without allowing good access for short-cutters,” Prof. Lovegrove said.
Dedicated bike/pedestrian/bus routes, mixed retail/residential land use and traffic calming infrastructure are also important considerations when planning a community based on sustainable road-safety principles. Prof. Lovegrove is eager to put theory into practice and has been looking for a new community development that is willing to try a design based on the ideas of sustainable road safety.
In the meantime, he is looking forward to June, 2011, when his sustainable road safety research lab will open at the University of British Columbia’s Okanagan campus. It will be the first of its kind in the world and he’s hoping not only to attract top-level international researchers, but to build a technology transfer centre where his research can be used by city planners and engineers to build safer and more sustainable communities.
Special to The Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/seeking-critical-mass-for-safer-cycling-in-vancouver/article1696980/
Update from the House
The fight to stop the HST in the Legislature is coming down to the wire. The government will likely push through the legislation it needs for the HST in a vote today. (That doesn’t mean the public campaign is over – Bill Vanderzalm’s petition against the HST is ongoing and you can find out more about that at Elections BC.)
On your behalf, I continue to argue in the Legislature that ending the PST exemption on bikes, bike supplies and repairs – which effectively creates a new 7% tax on cycling - is a mistake.
Below is a video clip of what I said yesterday afternoon in the House to the Colin
Hansen, Minister of Finance. (The transcript follows.)
There are many actions this government could take now to encourage cycling. Whatever happens with the HST, please know that I will continue to work as hard as I can to make BC bike-friendly again!
Lana
Lana Popham, MLA
lana.popham.mla@leg.bc.ca
|
Transcript from Hansard
L. Popham: My questioning is around the sales of bicycles and bike parts and repairs in British Columbia. It would seem that bike sales, repairs and parts would fit in within a climate change action plan and the green agenda that are spoken about in this House, as well as it going towards supporting a reduction in our health care budget. I know there was no consultation within this retail sector or consumer group, and there's been huge backlash by people who support cycling in British Columbia. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
I've created a website and a database that reaches the majority of bike shops in B.C. as well as thousands and thousands of cyclists. This group is a very potent constituency, in my view. I know that the minister's answer, when I ask a question, will be directed at me, but the answer will be clipped and sent out immediately to thousands and thousands of people in British Columbia who don't understand why an exemption for bicycles won't be brought in. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
My question is: why did bicycles not meet the prescribed circumstance to meet as a qualifying property? [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
Hon. C. Hansen: As we discussed earlier with her colleague, the Finance critic — in fact, he raised it — under the provisions that were set out by the federal government, there's a maximum of 5 percent of the GST tax base that can be unique for provincial-only HST exemptions — so those items that are subject to GST but that can be exempted from the provincial portion of the HST. We have maxed out the number of the items that we can use within that 5 percent. For us to have considered any other product, we would have had to bump some things off that list. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
L. Popham: It would seem that given the talk about reducing our carbon emissions, bicycles should have fit into that 5 percent. Can the minister tell me why bicycles were not fit into the 5 percent that we were given? [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
Hon. C. Hansen: With the six items that we chose for the exemption, it used up all of that 5 percent room. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
L. Popham: How was that decision made on those items? [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
Hon. C. Hansen: With regard to the first five items, they actually were the items that the province of Ontario chose. We looked at those, and we were encouraged, to whatever extent possible, to model our exemptions after the same so that there could be consistency and ease of administration. In addition to that, we still had additional room and we made the decision to exempt prescribed motor fuels. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
L. Popham: Can the minister tell me how much additional revenue the government will get by taxing bikes, bike parts and repairs? [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
Hon. C. Hansen: That would be outside of the scope of this question, but I do not have that information with me. [DRAFT TRANSCRIPT ONLY]
B.C. premier Gordon Campbell’s new bike clothes
By Lana Popham
We all know the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale about the self-absorbed emperor who foolishly believes he is wearing a suit made of cloth that is visible only to those who are intelligent and upstanding. He can’t see the cloth himself, but pretends otherwise so as to not lose face. As he parades naked through the town, a child calls out “But he isn’t wearing anything at all!” and the obvious truth is revealed.
I was reminded of this story recently while watching a video clip from 2008 on the B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Web site. Premier Gordon Campbell is dressed in his finest cycling outfit and proudly announcing $31 million for cycling infrastructure.
The video is still featured on the government’s site, and the press release of $31 million is still trumpeted as news. Their promise is exciting:
Cyclists throughout British Columbia will benefit from new, safe and high-quality cycling trails, bike lanes, bike lockers and more, thanks to Bike BC, a $31-million program for cycling infrastructure.
Bike BC is one of the largest investments the Province has ever made in building and improving cycling infrastructure in communities across the province. This will enhance cycling as an option for people to commute, run errands or spend their leisure time.
The program is a strategic investment to build important cycling corridors of regional and provincial significance and will be awarded province wide over the next three years. Some possible projects are new bike trails and cycling lanes, improvements to existing cycling infrastructure, and providing for bike lockers and other equipment that makes cycling a safer and more convenient option for travelers.
Cycling is a key component of the Province’s strategy for encouraging healthy living and addressing climate change, in conjunction with the Climate Action Plan and the Provincial Transit Plan.
This was an exciting moment for cyclists, cycling advocacy groups, people who support green transportation, and people who believe fighting climate change should be a priority. And it was a moment of relief: the government promised three years of support for initiatives that could address so many things for so many people.
But it was not to be.
No matter how long they continue to try and take credit for this progressive step, the fact is it is a step that was never taken.
The $31 million was cancelled just as surely as the cycling infrastructure was never completed. In fact, funding for cycling support was cut in the budget this month by more than 66 percent. Another broken promise.
And to add insult to injury, the HST will create a seven-percent increase in the cost of bikes, bike gear, and bike repairs. For 30 years there was a PST exemption for these expenses, with successive governments recognizing the health and environmental benefits of cycling. With the imposition of the HST, this government is creating a new disincentive to cycling.
So here is the problem for the government. And believe me it’s a big problem. They have disappointed and deceived a very potent constituency in British Columbia. This is a group who is not necessarily defined by their political stripes, by their age, by their income level, or by any other demographic. This is a group that spans the political spectrum and the province, and they are frustrated and bewildered by this flip flop. It’s three years until the next election—and these people are going to remember.
I think everybody understands our province is going through a period of economic turmoil. We get that. What we don’t understand is how a government can change its values. Values should not be affected by the economy.
In the case of this government, they have gone from touting cycling as key component of the province’s strategy for encouraging healthy living and addressing climate change, to creating a new tax and pretending it’s to fund healthcare.
So it is left for me to say it: the bike clothes are gone and this premier isn’t wearing anything at all.
Lana Popham is a avid cyclist and the MLA for Saanich South on Vancouver Island. Her Web site www.squeakywheels.ca is bringing together cyclists who want the B.C. government to be bike-friendly again.
Original article: http://www.straight.com/article-298838/vancouver/lana-popham-bc-premier-gordon-campbells-new-bike-clothes
Thanks!
Many people helped to make this event a success. First of all, I want to acknowledge Samuel Godfrey, my talented Constituency Assistant. And.... Michael Dayan of Helliwell Productions did a great job behind the camera. I also want to praise the inspired work of Mikael Colville-Andersen, of Copenhagen Consulting. He graciously allowed us to use his photograph in our poster. And thanks to Michele Murphy for designing such a striking poster! The Victoria artist Ami Muranetz created a beautiful and eye-catching banner – thank you! (Click here for Ami’s website) Also thank you Jacob and Amber for your help in postering Victoria. I’d also like to thank my new part-time Constituency Assistant Ben Johnson for all his great help and Mike Vasilev for his excellent volunteer networking efforts. Thanks to Julie Kaye and Bill Gaylord for doing such a good job with the sound system. Mark Hutchison, thank you for your work on the squeakywheels.ca website! And kudos to Pedal Pundit Jamie Ollivier for his poetry and videography. (Click here to see his website). Thanks to the brilliant coffee people at Caffe Fantastico.
Thanks to the cycling industry for showing support, especially bike stores (like Fairfield Bike Store, Russ Hayes, and Capital City Cycles), bike manufacturers like Kona, Rocky Mountain Bicycles, and the Victoria Pedi-Cab Company.
Thanks to all the folks in Nanaimo for showing great initiative and pulling off an excellent event in your home town!
Thanks to all the speakers and the MC Maestro David Cubberley.
And finally, to the 500 cyclists who came out for the rally and the 5000 people who signed the petition: THANK YOU!
Lana Popham MLA, Saanich South Critic for Agriculture and Lands
PS. Check out the latest video from the much-loved “Pedal Pundit” of Vancouver:
Thank You!
The rally today was fantastic. We had an amazing turn-out with more than 600 cyclists! People came from as far away as Vancouver and Duncan. There was a really good energy in the crowd. I was also proud to submit the petition to the Legislature this afternoon - it had almost 5000 signatures on it! Thank you to everyone who made this possible. The rally and petition were just the beginning of my efforts to make the BC government bike-friendly again. I'll post more details as soon as I catch my breath! Lana.
Update!
Hi,
Update!
Bike Rally Poster
It's 11x17 and off to the printer. Thanks to Michele Murphy! Click here to download a high-resolution version.
Rally at the Legislature!
And 1000 bikes on the lawn of the legislature will get this government's attention!
Petition: Public Comment of the Day
I ride my bicycle everywhere. Whether it's commuting to and from work, going to the store, or running errands. I've never owned a car, and have no need for one as I live in the city. I borrow a car from a friend if i need to move something big, but I'd be happy if they ditched their cars too. Join a car co - op!
I think it's a horrible idea to increase tax on bicycles... Let's encourage people to take more ACTIVE modes of transport. Cycling is more affordable, has less impact (both on "the environment" and our communities), it requires less infrastructure, it is less dangerous to other people, it is often quicker (especially downtown, or on trips <5km), it improves your health, etc etc.
I think raising taxes on bicycles is a big slap in the face to anyone seeking a more responsible mode of getting around.
Geoffrey V., Vancouver
Comment of the Day
I am a registered nurse and I ride a bike.....I have several bikes...mountain and road....and I see the results daily of what inactivity does for people....and I also see the benefits of riding a bike.....the joy, the exercise, the effects on the environment....and I cannot believe that the government is adding tax to this most incredible way of exercising and travelling...instead of creating incentives for more of us to get on our two wheels the government is taxing and making it more un-affordable......in my opinion the government is a bunch of hypocrites...they say one thing and do another.
Comment of the Day
To Whom It May Concern,
I'm a new transplant to BC, have been here for a year and 3 months now. For about 10 months now I've been commuting to work daily by bike, riding from my home in Vancouver East to the office in downtown Coal Harbour. The daily ride has been one of the best things about living here. I get to enjoy exercise and the scenery; others benefit from my little part to help reduce pollution and traffic injury/deaths. Wouldn't it be great if more and more residents of BC come to realize that commuting by bike (yes even through the rain!) is fun and beneficial for everyone? Wouldn't it behoove the government to encourage this behavior through tax incentive? In my opinion, allowing the HST to apply to bicycles (and bicycle safety equipment) is exactly the opposite of what is needed in an age when reducing energy consumption, green house gas, and people's waistlines are primary concerns for every developed nation.
Respectfully,
Y. Lin, Vancouver
Comment of the Day
I bike. But as a physician I also see the daily result of a population that does not move their bodies as part of their everyday lives. From knee replacements to back surgery, the provincial government pays.
Dr. Laura D., Vancouver B.C.
Update
I wonder if the B.C. government can explain how jacking up the price of a bike is going to help make B.C. more sustainable or encourage people to make healthy lifestyle choices. How does this possibly advance B.C.’s Climate Action Plan?
A government that increases taxes on green transportation is traveling in the wrong direction.
I am of the view that we need to create incentives for green transportation and disincentives for more polluting forms of transportation. Standing up for cyclists as an Opposition MLA is one way that I can help keep the pressure on.
While we were unsuccessful in stopping the government from imposing the HST (on bicycles) we were part of a larger movement that has successfully kept alive the opposition to the HST.
Cyclists continue to argue that tax increases on green transportation options - like cycling - are a mistake. We are calling for provincial policy changes which will create incentives for people to choose greener ways to travel.